This is an action to ensure candidates who feel aggrieved in any competitions. Many people use these resources because it is common for mistakes to be made along the way, whether due to poorly worded questions or issues that deviate from the content stipulated in the public notices.
The resources work for both discursive and objective evidence and can be categorized into two models: judicial or administrative. The difference between the two is simple:
- Judicial evidence appeal: indicated for when the student has already tried administrative appeals and was unsuccessful. For this action, the candidate must be assisted by a lawyer to file lawsuits with the examining board;
- administrative test appeal: the first appeals must be made in an administrative manner, guaranteed by law, by the candidate himself.
In general, there are stipulated deadlines for the appeal to be made and it is – generally – provided for in the announcement of the tender provided, but, if not, the appeal can be made within three days, when it is of an administrative nature, and up to 120 days for lawsuits.
But then, how to make a test appeal?
To make a test appeal, it is necessary, first of all, to be aware of the public notices and deadlines stipulated for all stages. Although the contests follow some standards, each one of them has its own specifications and you should be aware of all of them.
Remember that the safest information you can have is located only in the notice. Whether to look for some information or to check a deadline, when in doubt, always use it.
The next steps to make your appeal is to formulate objective justifications and present clear and strong arguments. The next steps must follow what is requested by the notice, such as the channel in which your appeal must be registered.
5 practical tips for making a test appeal
Now that you know what it is, how it works and how to make a test appeal, it’s time to understand some interesting and relevant tips to prepare your administrative appeal. Check out!
1. Be respectful
When we talk about respect, we talk about respect for deadlines, schedules and recipients. Use impersonal language to refer to panelists, remember that you are trying to convince them that they should re-evaluate their answers. However, it doesn’t have to be too formal either – try to balance in the middle ground.
2. Use solid arguments
You, the candidate, probably know the concept of an argumentative dissertation, right?! You need to bring concrete elements, sources that justify them, and, above all, that are convincing enough. If necessary, use biographies and sources that are appropriate for the subject at hand.
3. Get straight to the point
Be objective and direct, no beating around the bush about what you want and what you need. Bring, right from the start, the reason why you are writing, the question to be analyzed, the answer that you consider right and the necessary arguments. You will likely have limited space to write your feature and need to make the most of it.
4. Be your own resource author
I know it’s tempting to ask an acquaintance who is “good with words” to write for you, or even get that ready-made template off the internet. Any of these options are stuck. All resources that have the same structure tend to be disregarded by the bank, so be the author of your resource text yourself.
5. Write and rewrite
No need to send the first text you write. Train, write, rewrite and ask someone to read it, preferably a teacher who is used to the subject and, above all, who agrees with you. The text needs to be clear, objective and convincing.